Site Last Updated:

Sign up for your FREE TFN E-NEWS Alert TODAY!

Let Taipan Financial News be your resource for late-breaking investment opportunities.


We value your privacy!

 

Indices: US - World |
Most Actives


Try Taipan Financial News Stock Screener



Taipan Financial News Video Guide

Our Products

Free Newsletters

News Feed

Subscribe to Taipan Financial News Feeds by Email

 Subscribe in a reader

Add to Google

Add to My AOL

Subscribe in Bloglines

PODCAST:

Get Taipan Financial News Podcast On Your I-Tunes

Add Taipan Financial News Feeds to ODEO

Subscribe in podnova

Add to Pageflakes

Premium Membership

Also on TFN

Visit Our New Bookstore
Best Offer

Sponsored by:


tfn declaration seal

 

 

 

Share this story Share this story | Print this story Print this story

Investing in Stem Cells: Stay Away Next Tuesday

By Ian L. Cooper

Friday Apr 06, 2007

Sure, 60% of the U.S. supports stem cell research legislation.  The legislation passed in the House in January.  And it’ll easily pass through the Senate.  But the buck will likely stop at Bush’s desk… where he’ll veto it again, just as he did last year.

While I won’t entwine political commentary into investment advice, I will say that the Senate is likely to fall short of the 67 votes needed to override a veto.  Just last year, the House and Senate approved the funding bills that were later vetoed by the President.  The House then failed to override that veto and the Senate, which did not vote, was also short of the two-thirds vote. 

With that in mind, please don’t get swept up buying Aastrom, StemCells Inc, or even Geron, at this point.  Your best bet is to buy stem cell stocks, like those mentioned above, as the road to the next White House Administration heats up.  And should a pro-stem cell president take over, the sky’s the limit for stem cell stocks.

Investing in Stem Cells: The April 10 Vote

The Senate has scheduled April 10 as its voting day on two stem cell measures.  The first measure seeks to mandate federal funding of embryonic stem cell research that would also require the destruction of unborn children for stem cells.

The other – including provisions by Sen. Isaksson (R-Ga.) and sponsored by Coleman (R-Minn.) – seek to fund research on stem cells taken from “dead” embryos, or those embryos taken from living embryos without having to destroy them, according to Congress Daily (as referred to by Medical News Today). 

The report continues, “Isakson's provisions would allow federal funding for research on stem cell lines derived from embryos that are not likely to survive during the freezing process or in the womb. According to Isakson, the measure also would promote research using stem cells derived from other sources, such as amniotic fluid. Coleman said the bill might add to the 21 viable stem cell lines currently eligible for federal funding.”

Take care,
Ian L. Cooper, Editor, Early Alert Trader

 

Advertisement
advertisement